Post by SanxGreetings to all
http://www.xrtml.org
Can be considered as an alternative to the use of CometActors?
I wouldn't mix it with a Lift project because you'd likely get into nasty
issues about connections ownership, etc.
I'm not sure how they support all the different platform types (PHP,
ASP.net and JVM).
If you have specific issues with Lift's CometActor implementation, let's
talk about them.
Please keep in mind that the Lift CometActor implementation has been tested
in production for more than 4 years. It's been tested against a wide
variety of web browsers. It's been tested against a wide variety of device
types. It's been tested against a wide variety of connection loss
situations (for fun, run a Lift comet app, then sleep your laptop for 5
minutes and then re-open it... you'll have the correctly rendered page).
Further, as Diego points out, the Lift CometActor implementation is secure
against XSS and other vulnerabilities by default.
Also, Lift's CometActor implementation is resource efficient (doesn't use
anything more than an NIO socket) and code efficient (using the Actor
paradigm makes for very simple asynchronous code).
So, if you've got a specific use case that Lift's CometActors are not
meeting, let's talk about it.
Post by SanxThank you very much for your attention
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework: http://liftweb.net
Code: http://github.com/lift
Discussion: http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb
https://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Posting_example_code
--
Visi.Pro, Cloud Computing for the Rest of Us http://visi.pro
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Blog: http://goodstuff.im
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework: http://liftweb.net
Code: http://github.com/lift
Discussion: http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb
Stuck? Help us help you: https://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/liftweb/Posting_example_code